![]() Meanwhile, MobileGamer reports that some developers are being told that Unity will offer them an 80 to 100 percent waiver on planned Runtime fees if they start using the company's LevelPay SDK to find and serve in-game ads. The rules have changed, and the stakes are simply too high." We urge others who share this stance to do the same. In an open letter posted on Friday, a number of prominent mobile game companies representing billions of combined game installs promised to boycott Unity's ad platform and IronSource ad mediation products "until these changes are reconsidered. Unity is also facing more organized financial pressure from some developers. Caves of Qud developer Brian Bucklew memorably documented his marathon porting work from Unity to Godot over the weekend, though the situation for the retro-styled 2D roguelike might not be representative of more complex porting efforts. In the wake of Unity's announcement, an increasing number of game developers have announced their intention to abandon the Unity engine for competitors like Unreal or the open source Godot. ![]() "If they make line 1 of their EULA one that guarantees we can continue to use current and past versions of Unity under those terms, maybe with a provision that they can scale the sub fee within some reasonable bounds-that’s better than trust," indie developer Tom Francis wrote in a blog post about the complicated legal terms underlying the whole situation. We at Zeboyd will be using a different engine in the future."įurther Reading Wait, is Unity allowed to just change its fee structure like that?Other developers are holding out some hope that the introduction of some significant legal protections in new licensing terms could help repair their relationship with Unity. "Unity has shown such hatred and disdain for indie developers that they can no longer be trusted. "Publishers can no longer trust that the deals they make with Unity developers won't worsen over time," Zeboyd Digital Entertainment's Robert Boyd said in a statement that sums up similar feelings being expressed publicly by many developers. But even a full about-face might not be enough to satisfy some longtime Unity developers at this point. It's currently unclear whether those changes will amount to tinkering around the edges of the fee structure as currently planned or represent a more complete rollback of the idea of charging install fees in the first place. "Thank you for your honest and critical feedback." "We are listening, talking to our team members, community, customers, and partners, and will be making changes to the policy," the post reads. In a late Sunday social media post, Unity offered apologies for the "confusion and angst" caused by the sudden announcement of the policy last Tuesday. Further Reading Unity’s new “per-install” pricing enrages the game development communityAfter nearly a week of protracted developer anger over a newly announced runtime fee of up to $0.20 per game install, Unity says it will be "making changes" to that policy and will share a further update "in a couple of days."
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |